Eng301 Rogerian Argument Essay and Peer review for Nanette Erickson

Peer Evaluation Guidelines, Rogerian Argument Essay

Key Criteria:

Rhetorical Awareness; Purpose and Content; Ethical Use of Sources; Self-Evaluation and Critique; Knowledge of Conventions

Peer Evaluation Questions:

  • Has the author clearly established the topic and the need for further conversation about the topic?
  • Do you see a summary of opposing views, and is it clearly identified as opposing views to the author?
  • Has the author identified what they and their opponents agree about and why?
  • Is there a clear establishment of their position?
  • Have they effectively supported the strengths for their position?
  • Have they addressed drawbacks and/or limitations for their opposition and their own position?
  • Is there a call to action which addresses what needs to be done and how all parties will benefit?

Responses to the following questions must be in complete sentences; brief responses or quick bullets will result in 0 credit.


  • What are the strengths of the introduction?Why?
  • What needs to be improved?How?Be specific.
  • What are the strengths of the conclusion?Why?
  • What needs to be improved?How?Be specific.


  • What are the main strengths of the body?Why?Highlight at least one example to help the author understand what and why.
  • Identify at least three areas, or representative areas, that need to be improved.
    • Why do these need to be improved?
    • How specifically can these be improved?


Which main three criteria from the Writing Portfolio Rubric do they do well in addressing?Why?

Do it for each paper student 1 and student 2

Answer each q