Peer Evaluation Guidelines, Rogerian Argument Essay
Key Criteria:
Rhetorical Awareness; Purpose and Content; Ethical Use of Sources; Self-Evaluation and Critique; Knowledge of Conventions
Peer Evaluation Questions:
- Has the author clearly established the topic and the need for further conversation about the topic?
- Do you see a summary of opposing views, and is it clearly identified as opposing views to the author?
- Has the author identified what they and their opponents agree about and why?
- Is there a clear establishment of their position?
- Have they effectively supported the strengths for their position?
- Have they addressed drawbacks and/or limitations for their opposition and their own position?
- Is there a call to action which addresses what needs to be done and how all parties will benefit?
Responses to the following questions must be in complete sentences; brief responses or quick bullets will result in 0 credit.
Introduction:
- What are the strengths of the introduction?Why?
- What needs to be improved?How?Be specific.
- What are the strengths of the conclusion?Why?
- What needs to be improved?How?Be specific.
Body:
- What are the main strengths of the body?Why?Highlight at least one example to help the author understand what and why.
- Identify at least three areas, or representative areas, that need to be improved.
- Why do these need to be improved?
- How specifically can these be improved?
Conclusion:
Which main three criteria from the Writing Portfolio Rubric do they do well in addressing?Why?
Do it for each paper student 1 and student 2
Answer each q