What is Huemer’s argument that individuals have a right to immigrate? (Summarize his reasoning from sec 2 in a few sentences.)
Huemer considers several objections to this conclusion (sec 3 and 4). Explain in your own words the objection you find the most compelling, and why you agree, or not, that it refutes Huemer’s conclusion.
Why might someone think that a government is justified in restricting immigration in order to preserve a national culture (sec 3.4)? Do you think that is a legitimate purpose of governmental control?
[Please keep your responses within] 600 words